Achinthya Nanayakkara (Quantum Asylum)

I asked r/AskPhysics I hear that electrons in atoms are in bound states around the nucleus, smeared out rather than a point particle. If bound electron (let's say an excited state in hydrogen-like atom), has kinetic energy.. does it still 'move' in some way, and in the process, does it not radiate and energy? Or do things happen so that electron in a bound state will remain in the same energy state unless spontaneously excited/grounded to higher/lower states? I also hear that electrons prefer being in the lowest energy state allowed, and that the electron would be in 1s ground state, cuz it somehow has the lowest energy. The bound electron, whatever it is, is still negatively charged.. what is stopping thr thing from collapsing positive proton. Does that somehow have more energy than the ground state? I also hear, that when approaching absolute zero, something of electron losing more and more energy, and its some zero point energy due to uncertainty that somehow keeps elect...

 I asked on r/AskPhysics "I hear that any form of energy is said to curve space-time, would that be true for the energies of electric and magnetic fields too? The magents used in scrap yards can lift hunks of metal, against gravity, the same for static electricity of comb lifting paper scaps.. are these also results of space-time curvature? Can electric charges curve space-time in the same way mass does? I don't know it has 'energy' in the sense. If they do.. would it be possible to have large electric currents or magnetic fields to cause time dilation? Cuz, that would he awesome. Or to have EM fields with so much energy, that they collapse into black holes? I am but a layman, so apologies in advance for any naivities 😅" I was replied.. Yes and no, by u/N-Man I hear that any form of energy is said to curve space-time; Yes, when people say that they are talking about General Relativity, which is a theory describing gravity. In this sense, the force that you know a...